.NET / C#
Azure Cloud Architecture
Well-architected Azure solutions, from app services to serverless and containers.
Most Azure trouble is not technical. It is an architecture chosen for a demo, an environment nobody can rebuild, and a bill that grows without anyone able to explain which service is responsible.
We design for the load you actually have, define it as code so environments are reproducible, and put cost attribution in from the start. That last one is unglamorous and it is the difference between a platform you control and one you tolerate.
What you get
- Architecture aligned to the Azure Well-Architected Framework
- Infrastructure as code, so environments are reproducible
- Networking, identity and secret management design
- Cost model with attribution by service and environment
- Backup, recovery and failure-mode documentation
Questions
App Service, Container Apps or Functions?
App Service for a steady web workload, Container Apps when you want container portability without running Kubernetes, Functions for genuinely event-driven work. Kubernetes only when the scale or the team justifies it, which is less often than it is chosen.
Can you reduce our current Azure bill?
Frequently, yes. The usual wins are right-sizing over-provisioned services, reserved capacity for predictable load, and shutting down non-production environments outside working hours.
More in Custom Software Development