Microsoft 365
SharePoint Solutions
Intranets, document management and collaboration platforms on SharePoint and Microsoft 365, governed, searchable and built to scale.
The short version
What this actually involves
Almost every organisation we meet already pays for SharePoint and still keeps its important documents on drives, in mailboxes and on someone desktop. The licence was never the missing piece. The information architecture was.
SharePoint rewards a deliberate structure and punishes an accidental one. Decide what a document type is, what metadata is mandatory, who must not see what and how long things are kept, and it will serve you for a decade. Skip that and you get a tidier version of the mess you started with, then blame the platform.
We build the structure, the automation and the governance model underneath Microsoft 365, and we have delivered exactly this for a practising law firm and an independent college.
Capabilities
What’s included
- Intranet & portals
- Document management
- Workflow & Power Platform
- Migrations & governance
Deliverables
What you get
- Site architecture and content types designed to your work
- Metadata-driven libraries with versioning and retention
- Permission model, including information barriers where needed
- Power Platform automation for the processes that ran on email
- Migration with a reconciliation report you sign off
- A governance model with named owners and a review cycle
How we work
From first call to something you can use
Week 1–2
Information architecture
Content types, metadata, permissions and retention agreed before anything is configured. This is the whole project, and doing it after the build is how SharePoint gets a bad name.
Week 3–6
Build in your tenancy
Sites, libraries, metadata and the first automated processes stood up in your own Microsoft 365, not a sandbox you cannot keep.
Week 7–10
Migration
Content moved with metadata applied, and dead or duplicate content retired rather than carried across. Migrating the mess is the most common mistake here.
Week 11–12
Pilot team and training
One department goes live with us on hand, then a hypercare window before the rest follow a pattern that already works.
Ongoing
Governance that survives
Lifecycle rules, owner accountability and automated retention, so it does not decay the moment attention moves on.
Explore SharePoint Solutions
The work, broken down
Intranets & Portals
Modern SharePoint intranets that people actually use, branded, searchable, mobile.
Learn more →Document Management
Governed document libraries, metadata and retention across Microsoft 365.
Learn more →Power Platform Automation
Power Automate flows and Power Apps that streamline SharePoint-driven processes.
Learn more →Migrations & Governance
Safe migrations to SharePoint Online with a governance model that lasts.
Learn more →Typical stack
- SharePoint Online
- Microsoft 365
- Power Automate
- Power Apps
- Entra ID
- Microsoft Graph
- Power BI
- Purview
Case study
Microsoft 365
JTA Law, SharePoint Matter Management
A SharePoint document and matter-management platform for an Australian law firm.
Read the case study →Questions
What clients ask before starting
We already have Microsoft 365. What are we buying?
The structure and the discipline. Microsoft gives you the tools, not the information architecture, the automation or the governance. That gap is why organisations end up with sprawl, and it is the part we build.
Do we need a separate document management product?
Large organisations with deep practice-specific workflows sometimes do. For most small and mid-size organisations, SharePoint configured properly does the job without a second licence stack. We will tell you which you are.
How do you stop the sprawl returning?
Automate what can be automated: lifecycle rules, retention, owner accountability on every site, and a review cycle. Governance that depends on people staying disciplined forever does not hold.
Can you migrate from file shares or another system?
Yes. The hard part is not moving files, it is applying the right metadata so the destination is actually usable. That is why the architecture comes first.
Talk it through with an engineer
Thirty minutes, no obligation, and an honest answer about whether this is the right service for what you are trying to do.